.svg)
High-Risk AI Governance & Submission Service
Premium guidance for AI Accountable Officers navigating the complex process of high-risk AI system assessment and submission to the WA AI Advisory Board.
Under Western Australia's AI Assurance Framework, public sector entities must submit AI projects to the AI Advisory Board when residual risks are mid-range or higher, funding exceeds certain thresholds, or total costs exceed $5 million. Educational AI systems may require careful assessment to determine submission requirements.
High-Risk Applications Include:
- Student admissions and enrolment systems
- Personalised learning pathway algorithms
- Automated assessment and grading systems
- Plagiarism detection and academic integrity tools
- Student progress evaluation systems
Mandatory Requirements:
- AI Advisory Board review and approval
- Comprehensive self-assessment documentation
- Risk mitigation strategy
- Ongoing monitoring and reporting
- Complete self-assessment preparation and documentation
- Risk analysis and mitigation strategy development
- Advisory Board submission preparation
- Stakeholder communication and briefing materials
- Ongoing compliance monitoring framework
- Personal liability protection for AI Accountable Officers
- Professional indemnity through expert guidance
- Institutional risk management and reputation protection
- Board-level confidence in compliance processes
- Career protection through demonstrated due diligence
Executive Briefing & Risk Scoping
Confidential consultation with the AI Accountable Officer to understand the system, use case, and institutional context.
Comprehensive Technical Assessment
Deep-dive analysis of the AI system's architecture, data handling, algorithmic processes, and potential impact areas.
Self-Assessment Documentation
Preparation of comprehensive documentation addressing all framework requirements and Advisory Board expectations.
Submission & Ongoing Support
Formal submission preparation and continued support throughout the Advisory Board review process.
The role of AI Accountable Officer carries significant personal and professional responsibility. By September 19, 2025, every public sector entity must have appointed a senior executive to this position, making them directly accountable for all AI use within their organisation.
This is not a role that can be treated lightly. The decisions made and documentation prepared will be scrutinised by the state's expert AI Advisory Board. Getting it wrong could have serious implications for both the individual and the institution.
The Stakes Are High:
- Personal accountability for AI governance decisions
- Potential impact on student outcomes and institutional reputation
- Career implications of compliance failures
- Complex technical requirements beyond typical executive expertise
Protect Your Career & Institution
Don't navigate high-risk AI governance alone. Get expert support to ensure your submissions meet the highest standards.
Contact Us